🔗 Share this article

The Four Spent the Day Together features characters pursuing clean slates, attempting to leave behind substance abuse or abusive marriages, only to find hope curdling into violence. Chris Kraus frequently uses the phrase "new beginning", making it willfully cynical through its repetitions. Sentences like "He could make a fresh start" and "They decided to make a fresh start" recur in the story. And yet, she appears to be undertaking her personal new beginning, since this seems a novel form of writing – fact-based, genuinely novelistic. But then it reveals itself to be packed with the familiar conflicts and aesthetics as past novels.

From Chance Novelist to Cult Classic

Kraus was originally an creative who entered the literary world almost accidentally with her 1997 seminal work I Love Dick, structured as epistles to an unresponsive love interest, transforming personal female narrative from self-debasement into assassination. She kept producing books, but the three subsequent compelling and abrasive novels did not possess the impact and rawness that the correspondence format imparted to the voice of I Love Dick. Compounding this was her identity as a renegade artist who had evolved into a major property owner, so there was significant attention on real estate deals. It follows that she presently aims to try out different types of content, directing her gaze to other people's stories, at a moment when she asserts that contemporary political climate turns intimate literature unnecessary.

Multiple Generations, Shared Inescapable History

The Four Spent the Day Together is divided into three sections, encompassing several time periods – all unable to escape their histories. There is the tale of a couple named Emma and Jasper, based on the author's parents, transitioning from the New York borough to the Connecticut countryside. There is the story of Kraus herself, in the character of Catt Greene, confronting the late recognition of I Love Dick, the ascent of a political figure, and her addict husband her husband Paul. And there is the narrative of a homicide of one lost young man by another in a community mostly forsaken by liberal ideals only 80 miles from Catt's cottage in the Minnesota countryside.

As a reader fond of honed writing of the kind the author herself often avoids, I was seduced by the literary tone of the initial segment.

As someone who reads who favors precise prose of the variety that Kraus tends to eschew, I was won over by the storytelling approach of the opening segment. It exhibits a fresh level of observation that accommodates small details, like the bucket that the youthful Catt frees from the ice at the start of the story, aided by her cherished parent. "I discovered a frozen plaything!" she says; "a lovely toy", he responds, "the elliptical meanings of words circulating in their speech like piece candy". She tells Emma's narrative with inquiry and familiarity. "Emma felt like she'd stepped into a dream – not precisely her dream."

Disappointment and Disjunction

I was bound to become frustrated when I wished this new voice could continue through the novel. Kraus notes here that she resents the enjoyment audiences such as myself have taken from I Love Dick; she's dedicated to disruption, to the unpolished style she has in common with her inspiration Kathy Acker, and the blankness and repetitiveness of her past books reasserts itself in the central part. The protagonist is working on refurbishing 36 run-down apartments in Albuquerque's worst neighbourhoods while moving between Minnesota and LA, failing to help her husband curb his addiction. She experiences powerlessness as Paul cycles through low-resource employment as an substance abuse counselor in a world fueled by the rage and anxiety that powers Trump's victory. There are several pages about Catt being cancelled on social media, her professional designation altered from "author" to "landlord" on a reference site. The author still appears to be overly concerned about this. On one occasion she remarks that she's looking into the killing so that before departing the state, "she might be able to learn something about an America that her social media opponents would not understand, would not even perceive".

The Murder Narrative

Then we reach to the homicide in question – and the eponymous day experienced by the deceased with the murderer and his companions. The author possesses compelling foundational content, and reconstructs step by step what happened when the victim Brandon came to meet Brittney after encountering her on a platform where she marketed explicit images. He anticipated intimacy but seems amiably to have occupied the day with her companions, mooching around having his vehicle repaired and covering the cost of food and substances, before being killed by gunfire by Brittney's boyfriend Micah – a individual with mental health challenges who has often been institutionalized for aggressive outbursts.

Fascination and Incompletion

Catt gets obsessed by the account, and I found myself captivated by the way that the author's conflicting impulses towards ethical reporting and reckless transgression wrestle in this part. But I'd have liked her to go further into her personal fixations here. The most interesting character is Brittney herself, who gains dimension partially because of Catt's identification with her – another bright, bullied girl spiraling out of control in a difficult, overlooked locality. The author informs us that Catt converses with Brittney in prison, but she doesn't dramatise these conversations. This entire part feels oddly unfinished, to the degree that her narrative ends almost mid-par