🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the procedure of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a major setback for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has provoked broad outcry both within the country and internationally.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority support, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for further consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," stated a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could influence comparable debates in additional EU countries